Regulatory Revolution: 5 Seismic Shifts Reshaping Banking's Future

Uncover game-changing insights on liquidity, supervision & capital reforms that will redefine your risk strategy #BankingRegulation #FinancialRisk

Regulatory Revolution: 5 Seismic Shifts Reshaping Banking's Future
Photo by Eduardo Soares / Unsplash

The ground beneath the banking industry is shifting, and the tremors are coming from an unexpected source: the Federal Reserve itself.

In a recent landmark speech, Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman laid bare the inadequacies of the current regulatory framework and proposed a series of reforms that could fundamentally alter how banks operate, manage risk, and weather financial storms.

For finance professionals, this isn't just another policy update—it's a clarion call for a complete strategic overhaul.

As we dissect Bowman's insights, we'll uncover five critical areas of change that will redefine banking resilience in the post-2023 crisis era.

FinFormed | LinkedIn
FinFormed | 603 followers on LinkedIn. Curating critical financial insights for tomorrow's leaders. | At FinFormed, we decode the complex world of finance for tomorrow's leaders. Our mission: Distill critical global financial trends and policies into actionable insights Spotlight emerging technologies reshaping the financial landscape Explore sustainable and ethical finance practices driving market evolution Daily, we transform dense financial reports, policy announcements, and market shifts into clear, impactful takeaways. Our curated content empowers professionals, policymakers, and forward-thinkers to navigate the rapidly changing financial world with confidence.

Modernizing the Liquidity Lifeline: Reinventing the Discount Window

The Fed's discount window, long seen as a last resort for struggling banks, is poised for a radical transformation that could make it a cornerstone of modern liquidity management.
Governor Bowman's speech highlighted a startling revelation: during the 2023 banking stress, some institutions faced significant hurdles in accessing the very tool designed to save them—the discount window. This failure exposed a critical weakness in the Fed's crisis response arsenal.

Key Proposed Changes:
24/7 Electronic Access: Replacing archaic phone-based systems with round-the-clock digital platforms.
Expanded Fedwire Hours: Consideration of 22/7 operations for the Fedwire Funds Service and National Settlement Service.
Operational Friction Reduction: Streamlining collateral movement between banks, FHLBs, and Reserve Banks.

Operational improvements—including technology enhancements and investments—and improving operational readiness within the Federal Reserve System, should underpin any approach to improvements.

Implications for the Finance Industry:

  1. Enhanced Crisis Responsiveness: Banks could access emergency liquidity faster, potentially averting full-blown crises.
  2. Liquidity Strategy Overhaul: CFOs and treasurers must reevaluate their liquidity contingency plans, incorporating the new, more accessible discount window.
  3. Technological Preparedness: Banks will need to invest in systems compatible with the Fed's modernized infrastructure.

Practical Application:
Imagine a scenario where a mid-sized bank faces a sudden liquidity crunch due to a cyber attack on a Friday evening. Under the current system, accessing emergency funds could take hours or even days. With the proposed reforms, the bank could instantly tap into the discount window electronically, stabilizing its position before markets reopen on Monday.

Holistic Liquidity Framework: Rethinking Funding Strategies

The days of siloed liquidity management are over. The Fed is pushing for an integrated approach that could rewrite the rules of bank funding.
Bowman's speech revealed a growing recognition that bank liquidity sources—from repo markets to Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and the discount window—are deeply interconnected. The Fed is now considering how to reflect this reality in regulatory frameworks.

Key Considerations:
• Integrating Discount Window Capacity: Exploring ways to recognize discount window borrowing capacity in calculating a firm's Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR).
• FHLB Advance Interplay: Assessing how changes in FHLB lending standards will affect overall bank liquidity planning.
• Collateral Prepositioning Impact: Evaluating how requiring banks to preposition collateral at the discount window might affect other funding sources.

We must consider and understand the interrelationships among these resources, liquidity requirements and regulations, and bank liquidity planning.

Implications for the Finance Industry:

  1. Diversification Imperative: Banks may need to cultivate a broader range of funding sources to meet new regulatory expectations.
  2. Stress Testing Evolution: Liquidity stress scenarios will likely become more complex, incorporating interplay between various funding sources.
  3. Regulatory Arbitrage Reduction: A holistic approach could close loopholes that allow banks to game individual liquidity metrics.

Supervision's Radical Refocus: Back to Banking Basics

The Fed is signaling a seismic shift in supervisory priorities, moving away from trendy topics to double down on core financial risks.
Bowman's speech was a wake-up call for supervisors who may have lost sight of the forest for the trees. She pointed out that many of the risks that led to the 2023 banking stress were not novel, but rather classic banking risks that had been overlooked.

Key Areas of Refocus:
• Concentration Risk
• Interest Rate Risk
• Liquidity Risk

It is clear in the case of SVB that these risks were not managed appropriately. Bank regulators and supervisors also failed to sufficiently identify and prioritize the appropriate risks.

Implications for the Finance Industry:

  1. Risk Management Overhaul: Banks may need to reinvest in traditional risk management capabilities that may have atrophied.
  2. Examination Preparation Shift: Compliance teams should expect more rigorous scrutiny of core financial metrics and less emphasis on qualitative factors.
  3. Strategic Planning Impact: Banks may need to reevaluate growth strategies that rely heavily on concentrated risk positions.

The Capital Rule Conundrum: Addressing Unintended Consequences

The current capital framework, designed to make banks safer, may actually be introducing new vulnerabilities to the financial system.


Bowman highlighted a critical oversight in current reform discussions: the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR). This requirement, intended as a backstop, has become a binding constraint that could disrupt crucial market functions.

Key Issues:
• Treasury Market Disruption: The eSLR can constrain banks' ability to intermediate in the Treasury market during stress periods.
• Overlapping Requirements: Current capital rules may have redundant or conflicting elements that create inefficiencies.
• Narrow Focus Problem: Addressing capital requirements in isolation ignores their interplay with other regulatory constraints.

It seems prudent to address this known leverage rule constraint before future stresses emerge that would likely disrupt market functioning.

Implications for the Finance Industry:

  1. Capital Allocation Strategies: Banks may need to develop more sophisticated models to optimize capital across multiple, interrelated constraints.
  2. Market Making Capacity: Reforms could enhance banks' ability to provide liquidity in critical markets, especially during stress periods.
  3. Regulatory Dialogue Shift: CFOs and risk officers should prepare for more nuanced discussions with regulators about capital adequacy.

Regulatory Process Reform: Enhancing Transparency and Accountability

The way banking rules are made could be as important as the rules themselves in ensuring a resilient financial system.
Bowman emphasized the need for a more rigorous, transparent process in developing and implementing banking regulations. This includes a preference for formal rulemaking over supervisory guidance and greater use of public Board meetings.

Key Process Improvements:
• Stringent Notice-and-Comment Procedures: Ensuring thorough public input on significant rule changes.
• Public Board Meetings: Increasing visibility into policymakers' rationales for major decisions.
• Comprehensive Impact Assessment: Evaluating the aggregate effects of interrelated rules, not just isolated impacts.

The hope is that material items on the reform agenda will continue to be handled through public meetings that give greater visibility and insight into the thinking and rationales of different policymakers.

Implications for the Finance Industry:

  1. Engagement Opportunities: Banks and industry groups may have more chances to influence regulatory outcomes through formal comments.
  2. Regulatory Predictability: A more transparent process could reduce policy uncertainty, aiding in long-term planning.
  3. Compliance Strategy: Legal and compliance teams may need to broaden their focus to track and analyze a wider range of public regulatory discussions.

Future Implications:

As these reforms take shape, we can expect:

  1. A more dynamic, technology-driven approach to liquidity management
  2. Increased emphasis on integrated risk modeling across different regulatory requirements
  3. A potential shift in bank business models to align with renewed focus on core banking risks
  4. More frequent and substantive interactions between banks and regulators on complex risk issues

To stay ahead:
• Invest in flexible risk management systems that can quickly adapt to regulatory changes
• Cultivate a culture of continuous learning and adaptation in risk and compliance teams
• Engage proactively in regulatory discussions, providing data-driven insights on potential reforms

Way Forward

The regulatory landscape in banking is on the cusp of a profound transformation. Governor Bowman's speech has laid bare both the shortcomings of the current framework and the ambitious scope of potential reforms. From reimagining crisis tools to refocusing supervision on core risks, these changes promise to reshape how banks operate, manage risk, and interact with regulators. For finance professionals, this is not just a regulatory shift—it's a strategic inflexion point that demands a comprehensive reevaluation of risk management practices, funding strategies, and regulatory engagement. As we navigate this new terrain, one thing is clear: adaptability and foresight will be the hallmarks of successful financial institutions in the years to come.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of the blog writer and his affiliations and are for informational purposes only.

Don't navigate this regulatory revolution alone. Subscribe to FinFormed's weekly insights to stay ahead of these critical changes. Have thoughts on how these reforms might impact your institution? Share this article and start a conversation with your network—the future of banking is being written now, and your voice matters.

If you found this blog post insightful, don’t forget to subscribe to our website for more updates. Your subscription will help us continue to bring you the latest insights. And if you think this post could benefit others, please feel free to share it. Let’s spread the knowledge together!

Michelle W Bowman: Liquidity, supervision, and regulatory reform
Speech by Ms Michelle W Bowman, Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, at the research conference “Exploring Conventional Bank Funding Regimes in an Unconventional World”, co-sponsored by the Federal Reserve Banks of Dallas and Atlanta, Dallas, Texas, 18 July 2024.

Stay ahead in finance. Join FinFormed for curated insights.